Thursday, May 11, 2006

A Physics Lesson

Why Pyrros Dimas can kick your ass


The reward you get from a particular activity is usually proportional to its difficulty. The harder it is, the more you get out of it--in the form of muscle growth, endurance, and speed.

Olympic lifting is one of the hardest activities out there. You're required to move large weights over long distances very quickly.

Why is it hard? A little physics lesson:

Work is equal to the force applied to an object, multiplied by the displacement, multiplied by the cosine of the angle of displacement. The result is a unit called Joules. I know you want to stop reading right now, but don't. You might learn something.

Work = force (N) * displacement (m) * cosine angle of displacement (theta)

When we're talking about O-lifting, the force (pounds/kilograms converted to Newtons) and the displacement (feet/meters) are in the same direction--more or less straight up. The angle of displacement (the difference between the direction of the force and the direction of movement) is zero in this case, and the cosine of zero is one. You should notice that the relationship is linear--the more you lift and the further you lift it, the more work you're doing.

As an example, let's say we move 75 pounds (~34 kg) from the floor to overhead. Let's say the total distance is 7 feet (~2.13 m), and we move the weight at a constant speed. We must apply enough force to overcome gravity. In this case, the force of gravity = 34 kg * 10m/s/s = 340 Newtons. Therefore, to move the weight upward at a constant speed, we have to apply 340 N of upward force.

Work = 340N * 2.13m * cosine 0 = 724.20 Joules

The more weight we move and the further we more it, the more work we do. If the weight was 150 pounds instead of 75, we'd get:

Work = (68 kg * 10m/s/s) * 2.13m * cosine 0 = 1448.40 Joules

Twice as much weight yields twice as much work.

How much weight would a benchpressing bodybuilder have to move to do this much work? Let's say he/she has to move the weight 2 feet (.61m).

1448.40 joules = (x kg * 10m/s/s * .61m * cosine 0)

x = 237 kg (522 pounds)

You can't do that in one rep, unless you spend a whole lot of time at Westside Barbell. For efficiency, you can't beat one C&J with 150 pounds. How many times would you have to bench 150 pounds to do an equal amount of work?

x = 1448.40 J/(68 kg * 10m/s/s * .61m * cosine 0) = 1448.40J/414.8J = 3.5 reps

If we assume a benchpress and a clean and jerk take the same amount of time, the C&J is 3.5 times as efficient!

We've taken into account that we're doing a lot of work, but how much power are we generating? Power is equal to work divided by time. The faster you lift (the less time it takes you), the more power you generate. Power output is measured in watts.

Power = work/time

The components of power:

Power =(force * displacement)/time

Power = force *(displacement/time) = force * velocity

This is intuitive. The stronger you are (force) and the faster you are (velocity), the more powerful you are. You do more work in less time! Sounds Crossfit to me.

Olympic lifting is fast and heavy. It requires a ton of work and a ton of power. You want to be strong and speedy? O-lifting is the answer--it'll get you there. Just remember, no matter how much weight you move, Dimas will always be better than you.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm pretty sure all those words were in English.

But I have absolutely no idea what you just said right there.

Talk about the pretty boys on the magazine covers again. I got that.

Thank you.

~ spartacus

5/12/2006 01:38:00 PM  
Blogger Jonathan Gilson said...

haha--Sam handed me my head on this one:

"I skimmed to the part where you said lifting more weights is harder..."

Yep, another insightful article from yours truly.

5/12/2006 02:03:00 PM  
Blogger Josh Roman said...

Due to some simple physics that schools should be able to teach to 8th graders (but don't for various bad reasons):

Oly lifters are badass motherf*ckers.

Keep it up Jon. Great reading. BTW, I'm thinking of adding the Harvard Stadium back into my weekly training regimen on Saturdays. So very crossfit. May take some getting used to, but my old PRs were a full stadium (37 sections) in just over 26 minutes and a double in 1:05. Interested in joining me?

joshroman (at) gmail (dot) com

5/12/2006 02:40:00 PM  
Blogger Jonathan Gilson said...

Crazy bastard! 37 sections, huh? Oh, hell yeah.

5/12/2006 03:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Ali said...

wait just one second-you can't do harvard stadium workouts without me!

5/13/2006 02:47:00 AM  
Blogger Jonathan Gilson said...

Heal up, Ali! I quit working for no woman :)

5/14/2006 04:53:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home